--- description: Assembla : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur Assembla, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Assembla - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Outils de gestion de projets](/directory/332/project-management/software) > [Assembla](/software/9949/assembla) # Assembla Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/9949/assembla Page : 1/5\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/9949/assembla?page=2) > Augmentez la productivité de votre équipe avec un wiki, un forum, des fichiers partagés et d'autres outils de collaboration traditionnels, tous combinés dans un flux d'activité dans Assembla. > > Conclusion : 103 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.2/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.2/5** | 103 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 3.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 3.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 70% | (7/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: IDERA - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2011 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 56,50 $US - **Type de licence**: (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afghanistan, Afrique du Sud, Albanie, Algérie, Allemagne, Andorre, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Arabie saoudite, Argentine, Arménie, Aruba, Australie, Autriche, Azerbaïdjan, Bahamas, Bahreïn, Bangladesh, Barbade et 208 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - API - Alertes/Notifications - Analyse de la productivité - Authentification - Authentification à 2 facteurs - Champs personnalisables - Communication multicanal - Compatible avec divers languages de programmation - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Cryptage - Définition des priorités - Développement collaboratif - Développement personnalisable - Examen du code - Facturation - Fonction de glisser-déposer - Gestion de projets - Gestion de versions - Gestion des affectations - Gestion des changements ## Intégrations (14 au total) - Dropbox - Filestack - GitHub - Gmail - Google Docs - Google Drive - Jira - Meta for Business - OneDrive - Slack - TestRail - Travis CI - Trello - Zapier ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Outils de gestion de projets](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/332/project-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Outils de gestion de projets](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/332/project-management/software) - [Logiciels de gestion du code source](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1477/source-code-management/software) - [Logiciels de bug tracking](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [monday AI Work Platform](https://www.getapp.fr/software/91734/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6134 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.getapp.fr/software/9953/jira) — 4.4/5 (15781 reviews) 3. [Caspio](https://www.getapp.fr/software/90524/caspio) — 4.6/5 (249 reviews) 4. [GitHub](https://www.getapp.fr/software/90537/github) — 4.8/5 (6216 reviews) 5. [Juno.one](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2047613/junoone) — 4.4/5 (26 reviews) ## Avis ### "A good software for planning projects" — 4.0/5 > **Edward** | *10 mars 2018* | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: This software offer a good UI and powerful usability, and have a comprehensive bouquet of all the necessary features. > > **Inconvénients**: The search function did not make sense. Data is not aligned properly and doesn't look pretty good, I think those could be improve. > > It has Sleek design and easy to understand. Assignments and priority are easy to adjust too. ----- ### "When GitHub issues just don't work" — 4.0/5 > **Jared** | *3 février 2021* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Ticketing is critical to our process for managing software project. Assembla has a great list view that allow us to have custom fields for each project. This allows us to create views into projects that sort and filter tickets by criteria meaningful to our stakeholders. Additionally tickets have good support for relationships and some hierarchy. This is in contrast to GitHub or GitLab issues, which offer limited support for sorting and filtering and require a tedious management of tags for everything not provided by default (which isn't much) A project with any serious complexity should consider using Assembla for ticket management. > > **Inconvénients**: The wiki syntax for tickets is non-standard and clunky. Developers use Markdown for every other tool that requires them to write prose. The lack of support for Markdown seems like a fairly large oversight. This becomes especially egregious when developers refuse to learn yet another syntax and just paste markdown into tickets despite the lack of support. Who can blame them. A more minor point is that the various features lack a coherent design language and level of quality. The UI/UX can be fairly different between modules, almost like they were written by different teams or at different eras of web development history. Also the level of quality varies wildly. You will find that some modules are rife with bugs and interface quirks while others operate bug free using modern interface idioms. Overall this makes the product seem lower quality than something more polished like GitHub, despite having a solid core of features needed for real project management. > > Overall our experience with Assembla has been positive and it is indispensable to our workflow. While it would be possible to replace it with another product, it would not be without the pain of changing how we work to accommodate the tool. ----- ### "Zero Customer Service" — 2.0/5 > **Christopher** | *7 octobre 2024* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 0.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It was not hard to use but I would not say it was easy or intuitive either. > > **Inconvénients**: By far, the customer service is the worst I have ever been involved with, especially at the management level. At several points during the conversation with a manager named \[sensitive content hidden\], he even laughed at the situation and specifically at me. The entire staff is in Portugal and from top to bottom I have never been treated so poorly by a company. > > Overall, after not following their 30-day cancellation policy to the letter we were automatically billed for an extra year with zero refund. Not only did nobody there apologize, I was even informed that they are very proud of their commitment to sticking to the policy. I even listened to \[sensitive content hidden\] tell me about a prior customer who made it all the way to the sensitive content hidden\] of the company, but in the end they were also not given one cent back. ----- ### "Kanban driven but needs improvements" — 4.0/5 > **Andrzej** | *3 février 2021* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Kanban board is one of the most advanced features from the market, it's quite clear and nicely designed. Sometimes drag n drop were rigged but lately i think it got fixed. Github integration should be in price not in higher tier as it's quite used. Wiki pages could be extendend. > > **Inconvénients**: I don't like that there is no emergency line as it should be in Kanban theory. I can't customise priorities Whole board view is horizontal driven i can't do a tree structure and see it from top down. Which is difficult if we need to monitor and organize more then 1 milestone or topics on one board. I can't have a view with 3-4 boards on its , we have 3 or 4 boards per project in a team, and as a team we should have a view which merges all 3-4 boards and allows to plan and organize tasks with the 4 different projects. Excel / google sheets export could be nice - sometimes for overall planning the cards are too heavy and there is too much colors, excel is quite tabular, and with my client we are often using excel beacuse its better for fast and simple view - this could be major enhancemnt to prepare simple view, which would give overall ticket status in form of table with columns ----- ### "Software administration that is straightforward and focused" — 4.0/5 > **Parth** | *8 février 2023* | Recrutement | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Assembla enables our team to coordinate and execute while maintaining complete visibility of what everyone is doing. Collaboration is undoubtedly a key component. The interface is simple to use and useful for project management. What I appreciate best about it is how simple it is to use, allowing anyone to import or export projects to the repositories. I truly like having a ticket area where I can submit issues to my coworkers. SecureGit, which offers strict security criteria, is included in Assembla. > > **Inconvénients**: I wish organisations were more strong, and search in particular is underwhelming. At times, user registration has proved problematic. Sometimes the invitations are not received, and it is difficult to resend them. Except for the most astute user, planning releases, running reports on estimates vs. actual time spent, and comparing that across several projects is nearly impossible. ----- Page : 1/5\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/9949/assembla?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/9949/assembla) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées