Spiceworks Cloud Help Desk

Le déploiement sur le parc informatique est facile, le retour d'info sur la gestion du parc est très pratique et intelligent.

Aucun inconvénient n'a été insurmontable.

Un top produit pour les professionnels de l'informatique et très simple pour gérer un meilleur service d'assistance informatique interne. J'adore ses fonctionnalités et sa facilité d'utilisation.

Dommage c'est indisponible pour certains pays mais j'apprécie ce qu'il propose et je le recommande.

Spiceworks is more like a service-oriented platform for IT professionals than Techcrunch is inclined towards the media outlet.
It's more like Stackoverflow for IT professionals and has benefitted me in getting my solutions related to actual network troubleshooting. The community has great experts giving you excellent solutions.

The UI can be a bit better with time and rest it's free to use for everyone.

Spiceworks is a high valuable solution with multiple levels, very easy to deploy, it could be setup as a level entry service desk solution but includes great features that you have on hand starting even with the free version.

As Spiceworks have several modules some of them remains with an effective use and could be great to have a configuration menu that disable that tabs not configured on the setup

Spiceworks is great for managing help desk tickets. Using HTML we've been able to customize our end-user portal. Create multiple ticket templates to capture the details we truly need from end-users. We have found that the mobile application for iOS and Android to be the best on the market. It has a great GUI, very user friendly, informative, and easy to set up.

The inventory system is lacking when it comes to producing accurate information. At one point this year we were upgrading our end users to dual monitors. We attempted to use Spiceworks to produce the make and model of the current monitor the end users were using. It came back telling us a generic description. I ended up writing a batch file that would obtain them remotely and that was accurate. We've also had issues where it would scan a computer that had 2 monitors but would only show one. We also went through a license key audit and thought we could rely on Spiceworks to produce accurate results. It ended up showing us that several computers had 3 iterations of office installed. I understand that these keys are in the registry but other similar scanners would only produce keys for whats actually installed on the workstation by cross-referencing installed applications and registry keys.

We recently have been experiencing issues where Spiceworks would attempt to scan 180 assets and it would fail to complete the scan without errors. We found this out by using WSUS to determine how many computers we had and Spiceworks was off by 30 assets of the 180. At least twice a week it also locks up and our end users can't access the help desk portal to submit tickets.

We've chosen to use LanSweeper to track assets. LanSweeper produced accurate results in a fraction of the time Spiceworks produced incomplete results. Spiceworks took 8+ hours, LanSweeper <30 minutes.