--- description: BrowserStack : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur BrowserStack, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: BrowserStack - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de bug tracking](/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/170655/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack Page : 1/31\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack est une plateforme de test cross-browser qui permet aux développeurs d'intégrer des outils pour effectuer des tests automatisés, visuels et en direct sur des applications mobiles et des sites web. Les équipes DevOps peuvent également exécuter des tests en local sur les applications WIP (Work In Progress) sans les héberger dans des environnements publics. > > Conclusion : 749 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 749 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: BrowserStack - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2011 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 39,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Australie, Brésil, Canada, Danemark, Inde, Irlande, Israël, Mexique, Royaume-Uni, Singapour, Émirats arabes unis, États-Unis, Îles Vierges britanniques, Îles Vierges des États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - A/B Testing - API - Accès mobile - Alertes/Notifications - Alerts/Escalation - Analyse de la productivité - Analyse des causes profondes - Analyse des tendances - Analyse prédictive - Analyse statique - Analyse visuelle - Annotations - Archivage et rétention - Assurance qualité - Authentification unique - Automated Testing - Benchmarking - Bibliothèque de questions - Capture d'écran - Catégories personnalisables ## Intégrations (16 au total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... et 1 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de bug tracking](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de bug tracking](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Logiciels de test de charge](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1959/load-testing/software) - [Logiciels de test utilisateur](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/2075/user-testing/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des tests](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/3879/test-management-tools/software) - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/389/testing/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Lyssna](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2041995/usabilityhub-1) — 4.6/5 (86 reviews) 2. [QA Wolf](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2047371/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (68 reviews) 3. [TestRail](https://www.getapp.fr/software/112767/testrail) — 4.3/5 (177 reviews) 4. [Lightster](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2073473/lightster) — 4.7/5 (9 reviews) 5. [Userlytics](https://www.getapp.fr/software/121415/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) ## Avis ### "A reliable option for browser testing" — 4.0/5 > **Miranda** | *21 avril 2025* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Very usable interface and generous free trial options (a range of different operating system options, etc.). > > **Inconvénients**: The first time I tested (back in 2023), there was a bug that prevented me from seeing the website in real-time. Since then, I believe the product has become more reliable. ----- ### "A Reliable Testing Companion That Takes the Hassle Out of Cross-Browser Work" — 5.0/5 > **Vandit** | *24 mars 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I liked most about BrowserStack is how much time it saved me from setting up and maintaining different testing environments. Instead of juggling virtual machines or physical devices, I can just pick a browser or device and start testing instantly. In my day-to-day work, this has been really helpful for catching cross-browser issues early, especially during regression cycles. The real device testing feels reliable, and the automation support made it easier to run repetitive test cases without much manual effort. I also found the platform straightforward to use after a short learning phase, and overall it genuinely helped improve my productivity and confidence before pushing releases. > > **Inconvénients**: One thing I liked least about BrowserStack is that it can feel a bit slow at times, especially when launching certain devices or running multiple sessions in parallel. During busy testing cycles, this can slightly impact the overall workflow. Also, there’s a bit of a learning curve when you first start using some of the advanced features, particularly around automation setup and integrations. While it gets easier with time, the initial setup can take some effort. That said, these issues haven’t been deal-breakers for me, and overall the platform still delivers strong value in day-to-day testing. > > Overall, using BrowserStack has felt less like adding another tool and more like removing a headache from my workflow. As a developer, I used to spend a lot of time worrying about environment setup and cross-browser inconsistencies—but with BrowserStack, that’s mostly off my plate. What stood out to me is how quickly I can jump between devices and browsers and actually see how things behave in real-world conditions. It’s been especially useful during last-minute checks before releases, where confidence really matters. It’s not perfect—there are moments when sessions take a bit longer than expected—but it hasn’t really disrupted my flow in a major way. Once I got past the initial learning curve, it became something I naturally rely on. In short, it’s one of those tools that quietly improves your day-to-day work without you realizing how much effort it’s saving you until you try working without it. ----- ### "Browserstack Review" — 3.0/5 > **udit** | *22 septembre 2025* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Ease of using Apple Pay testing in India. It was a good experience using apay via BrowserStack + a lot of other features that BrowserStack provide,s as bug capture > > **Inconvénients**: The BrowserStack gets stuck sometimes, and we have to end the session. So we can start again, but by doing this, we lose our work progress > > Access to a large library of real devices: A key advantage for developers and QA teams is the ability to test websites and mobile apps on thousands of combinations of real devices, browsers, and operating systems without needing a physical device lab. Robust testing capabilities: The platform supports both manual "Live" testing and automated testing using popular frameworks like Selenium, Playwright, and Appium. This allows for comprehensive functional, regression, and UI testing. ----- ### "A Game-Changer for QA Teams" — 5.0/5 > **Abhilash** | *23 mars 2026* | Banque | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: - Ease of Use: The platform is very intuitive and easy to navigate. - Wide Device Coverage: It provides access to a huge range of real devices and browsers for testing. - Reliability: Tests run smoothly with minimal downtime or glitches. - Cross-Browser Testing: Saves time by allowing you to test across multiple browsers and operating systems quickly. - Integration: Works well with CI/CD pipelines and popular tools like Jenkins, GitHub, and Jira. - Support: Helpful documentation and responsive customer support. - BrowserStack’s automation capabilities made it easy to run parallel tests across multiple browsers and devices, saving time and ensuring reliable results. > > **Inconvénients**: - Performance Issues: Tests can sometimes feel slow, especially on real devices. - Session Limits: Limited parallel sessions can restrict productivity. - Network Latency: Occasionally, there can be lag depending on internet speed. - Complexity for Beginners: New users may need time to understand advanced features. - Integration Challenges: Some integrations require extra setup effort. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. The platform is user-friendly, offers extensive device and browser coverage, and integrates smoothly with existing workflows. It has significantly improved the efficiency of our cross-browser testing. While there are occasional performance lags and limitations with parallel sessions, the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks, making it a reliable solution for comprehensive testing needs. ----- ### "All-in-One Solution for Cross-Browser and Device Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *23 mars 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I like most about BrowserStack is its ability to provide instant access to a wide range of real devices and browsers without the need for maintaining physical infrastructure. It significantly reduces testing time by enabling parallel execution and supports seamless cross-browser and cross-device testing. The platform is very user-friendly, integrates well with CI/CD tools, and helps in identifying issues early with reliable results. Additionally, features like live testing, automation support, and detailed debugging tools enhance overall testing efficiency and team productivity. > > **Inconvénients**: One of the main challenges with BrowserStack is occasional performance lag, especially during peak usage, which can impact real-time testing. The pricing can also be relatively high for smaller teams or startups. Additionally, debugging issues in automated tests can sometimes be less straightforward compared to local environments, and session timeouts or connectivity issues may interrupt longer test executions. While the platform is feature-rich, initial setup and configuration for advanced use cases can have a slight learning curve. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It has significantly streamlined our testing process by enabling reliable cross-browser and cross-device testing on real devices without the need for maintaining in-house infrastructure. The platform is easy to use, integrates well with automation tools and CI/CD pipelines, and supports both manual and automated testing effectively. It has helped improve test coverage, reduce execution time through parallel runs, and identify issues early in the development cycle. While there are occasional performance lags and some limitations in debugging complex scenarios, the overall stability, scalability, and convenience of the platform make it a valuable tool for ensuring high-quality releases. ----- Page : 1/31\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées