--- description: BrowserStack : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur BrowserStack, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: BrowserStack - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de bug tracking](/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/170655/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack Page: 1 / 25\ Suivant: [Next page](https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack est une plateforme de test cross-browser qui permet aux développeurs d'intégrer des outils pour effectuer des tests automatisés, visuels et en direct sur des applications mobiles et des sites web. Les équipes DevOps peuvent également exécuter des tests en local sur les applications WIP (Work In Progress) sans les héberger dans des environnements publics. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 602 users. Top-rated for **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Notation | Detail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 602 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Support client | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Prix à partir de**: 39,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Free version available) (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Target Audience**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000 - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Available Countries**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Australie, Brésil, Canada, Danemark, Inde, Irlande, Israël, Mexique, Royaume-Uni, Singapour, Émirats arabes unis, États-Unis, Îles Vierges britanniques, Îles Vierges des États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - A/B Testing - API - Accès mobile - Alertes/Notifications - Alerts/Escalation - Analyse de la productivité - Analyse des causes profondes - Analyse des tendances - Analyse prédictive - Analyse statique - Analyse visuelle - Annotations - Archivage et rétention - Assurance qualité - Authentification unique - Automated Testing - Benchmarking - Bibliothèque de questions - Capture d'écran - Catégories personnalisables ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de bug tracking](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de bug tracking](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Logiciels de test de charge](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1959/load-testing/software) - [Logiciels de test utilisateur](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/2075/user-testing/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des tests](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/3879/test-management-tools/software) - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/389/testing/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Lyssna](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2041995/usabilityhub-1) — 4.6/5 (85 reviews) 2. [QA Wolf](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2047371/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (68 reviews) 3. [TestRail](https://www.getapp.fr/software/112767/testrail) — 4.3/5 (176 reviews) 4. [Lightster](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2073473/lightster) — 4.7/5 (9 reviews) 5. [Userlytics](https://www.getapp.fr/software/121415/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) ## Avis ### "Affordable app with a wide range of tools." — 5.0/5 > **Yanina** | *2 septembre 2024* | Logiciels | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Browserstack is affordable for a single user – that's the main reason I chose it. As the only user in the team, I was looking for a tool that allows me to keep my documentation organised and offers an affordable plan. > > **Inconvénients**: I'm a new user – haven't found any cons yet. > > Browserstack is easy to use, comfortable to start and has the functionality I need in my work. ----- ### "BrowserStack is Overall good but need some upgrade" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *20 février 2025* | Logiciels | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Web live and App Live most like from this. Also App live its good for open any new devices like iphone and Android > > **Inconvénients**: Not able to open last opened device . Also not able to open setting menu for phone when we using app live > > I am using BS more than 3 to 4 yrs. Most of Using app and web live Less use of Accessibility and Web Inspector ----- ### "Comprehensive Real-Device Testing, Though a Bit Pricey" — 3.0/5 > **Amrut** | *25 novembre 2025* | Banque | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Massive Real Device Cloud: Access to thousands of real iOS and Android devices (not just emulators) is the biggest selling point. It makes debugging specific device-related issues very reliable. Ease of Integration: It integrates seamlessly with our existing automation frameworks (Selenium, Cypress, Playwright) and CI/CD pipelines (Jenkins/GitHub Actions). Local Testing: The ability to test internal staging and development environments securely using the Local Testing binary is incredibly useful. UI/UX: The interface is intuitive. Switching between devices, orientations, and capturing logs/screenshots during a live session is very smooth. > > **Inconvénients**: Cost: It is significantly more expensive than some competitors. For small startups or individual developers, the pricing tiers can be a barrier. Latency: During "Live" (manual) testing, there is occasionally noticeable input lag, especially when interacting with complex animations or heavy web apps on older mobile devices. Queuing: On very popular device/OS combinations (like the latest iPhone release), you sometimes hit a queue and have to wait a few minutes for a device to become available. > > regarding Value for Money, it is a premium tool. While it replaces the need for an internal device lab (which is a huge headache to manage), the subscription costs add up quickly if you need many parallel threads. ----- ### "Great Value for Mobile App Testing and Automation" — 5.0/5 > **Divyang** | *27 novembre 2025* | Logiciels | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: BrowserStack has been extremely reliable for our mobile automation workflows. The availability of real Android and iOS devices helps us validate UI, performance, and network behavior exactly as it would appear to end users. Integration with CI/CD tools like Jenkins and GitHub Actions is seamless, allowing us to trigger automated test runs on every build without maintaining our own device lab. The platform is fast, stable, and provides detailed logs, screenshots, and video recordings that make debugging much easier. Their support team is also responsive whenever we need help with configuration or device-specific issues. Customer support is too good and I really impressed with it. > > **Inconvénients**: Some high-demand devices get queued during peak hours, which can delay runs. Network-based tests sometimes require manual configuration, and setting up BrowserStackLocal for secure environments could be smoother, especially when running multiple parallel tunnels. Pricing can also feel slightly high for small teams, but the value justifies it. > > My overall experience has been excellent. BrowserStack has significantly reduced our testing overhead by eliminating the need to maintain physical devices. Our mobile automation suite runs consistently across OS versions, screen resolutions, and device manufacturers. Debugging has become quicker thanks to screenshots, logs, and session recordings. It has helped us improve QA coverage, speed up releases, and deliver a more stable mobile product. I would definitely recommend BrowserStack to teams looking for reliable cloud-based mobile testing infrastructure. ----- ### "Robust cross-browser testing software" — 5.0/5 > **Rakesh Kumar** | *28 août 2024* | Services et technologies de l'information | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: BrowserStack is a really handy tool for testing websites and apps across different devices and browsers. What I like most about it is its ability to provide real-time testing on actual devices rather than emulators. This can give you a much more accurate picture of how your site or app will perform in the wild. Plus, the ease of access to a wide range of devices and configurations can really streamline the development process and help catch issues early. Have you used BrowserStack yourself, or are you considering it for a project > > **Inconvénients**: One area where BrowserStack might have room for improvement is in the performance of its live testing feature. Sometimes, users report that the interaction can feel a bit laggy or slow, especially when dealing with high-traffic sites or complex application > > My experience with BrowserStack has been quite positive overall. It stands out for its robust cross-browser testing capabilities and the convenience of accessing real devices remotely. The platform’s interface is generally user-friendly, and it supports a wide range of browsers and operating systems, which is great for ensuring compatibility across different environments. ----- Page: 1 / 25\ Suivant: [Next page](https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data