--- description: BrowserStack : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur BrowserStack, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: BrowserStack - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de test de charge](/directory/1959/load-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/170655/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack est une plateforme de test cross-browser qui permet aux développeurs d'intégrer des outils pour effectuer des tests automatisés, visuels et en direct sur des applications mobiles et des sites web. Les équipes DevOps peuvent également exécuter des tests en local sur les applications WIP (Work In Progress) sans les héberger dans des environnements publics. > > Conclusion : 776 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 776 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: BrowserStack - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2011 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 39,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Australie, Brésil, Canada, Danemark, Inde, Irlande, Israël, Mexique, Royaume-Uni, Singapour, Émirats arabes unis, États-Unis, Îles Vierges britanniques, Îles Vierges des États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - A/B Testing - API - Accès mobile - Alertes/Notifications - Alerts/Escalation - Analyse de la productivité - Analyse des causes profondes - Analyse des tendances - Analyse prédictive - Analyse statique - Analyse visuelle - Annotations - Archivage et rétention - Assurance qualité - Authentification unique - Automated Testing - Benchmarking - Bibliothèque de questions - Capture d'écran - Catégories personnalisables ## Intégrations (73 au total) - APS Payroll - AWS Cloud9 - AWS Lambda - Android Studio - Appium - Asana - Atlas - Azure DevOps Labs - Azure DevOps Server - Azure DevTest Labs - Azure Pipelines - Azure SQL Database - Birdeye - Birdseye - BitBrowser ... et 58 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de test de charge](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1959/load-testing/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de test de charge](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1959/load-testing/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des tests](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/3879/test-management-tools/software) - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/389/testing/software) - [Logiciels d'IA générative](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/3874/generative-ai/software) - [Logiciels de test utilisateur](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/2075/user-testing/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [WebLOAD](https://www.getapp.fr/software/1999307/webload) — 4.2/5 (9 reviews) 2. [Lyssna](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2041995/usabilityhub-1) — 4.6/5 (87 reviews) 3. [QA Wolf](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2047371/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (77 reviews) 4. [TestRail](https://www.getapp.fr/software/112767/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 5. [Lightster](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2073473/lightster) — 4.7/5 (9 reviews) ## Avis ### "Reliable Cross-Platform Testing with Some Cost Considerations" — 4.0/5 > **Azmal** | *2 avril 2026* | Gestion de l'enseignement | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The biggest advantage of BrowserStack is its instant access to a wide range of real devices without needing to maintain physical hardware. The ability to perform live, manual testing on both iOS and Android devices directly from the browser is extremely convenient and saves a lot of setup time. I also found the platform very useful for: Quick debugging with real-time interaction Consistent performance across devices and OS versions Ease of use — no complex installation or configuration required Reliable cloud infrastructure, which makes testing smooth even for remote teams Overall, it significantly improves testing efficiency and helps identify real-world issues that emulators often miss. > > **Inconvénients**: The main drawback is the cost, especially for small teams or when you need extended access to real devices for manual testing. I also faced a few practical limitations: Session time limits and concurrency restrictions can slow down testing when multiple testers are involved Occasional lag or latency, particularly when network conditions aren’t ideal Limited free access, making it harder to evaluate thoroughly before committing Device availability issues at peak times (some popular devices are not always instantly accessible) > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It provides a reliable and efficient platform for testing applications across a wide range of real devices and browsers without the need to maintain physical infrastructure. The ability to perform live, manual testing on real iOS and Android devices is a major advantage, helping to identify real-world issues that are often missed in emulators. The platform is easy to use, quick to set up, and integrates well into existing testing workflows. However, there are some limitations, such as pricing, session limits, and occasional latency, which can impact productivity during heavy usage. Overall, it is a powerful and practical solution for cross-platform testing, especially for teams that need quick access to multiple devices, but it may require careful cost management depending on usage. ----- ### "BrowserStack addressed our all-testing requirements well." — 5.0/5 > **Thiwanka** | *30 septembre 2025* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Detailed Test Results Dashboard - For Automation Testing they provide very advanced dashboard, and it includes all test results, logs, screen recording videos and with many more details. This is well worth the money we paid. Sharable Public URL For All Test - We can get public URL for each test that we run on BrowserStack. So this test result management is very usefull and no need to manage results in another place. It is very useful for explaining issue to other teams. Their device farms have high security level and no risk at all. 24x7 Support Team and Learning Material availability - They response our support tickets within few hours and also, they have technical support teams to solve our technical gaps. > > **Inconvénients**: Pricing for the Parelle tests might me high for startups or small groups. But they have very flexible sales team, and we can chat and get discounts for annual plans, and you can negotiate the price. > > We choose BrowserStack as our device farm to run our Android and iOS mobile automation suites on pipelines. From the initial stage to now they gave unbelievable supports to make this goal success and when we are facing any issue their support teams assign ASAP and solve all issued that we faced. ----- ### "Focus on Future Nitche" — 3.0/5 > **Acharaj** | *1 avril 2026* | Services d'information | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Its Test Bed capacities Its Evaluation Matrix Improvisation (which is not live yet) All in one solution > > **Inconvénients**: Self Healing Feature is still not up to the mark Prompt Design Engg \& Self Feedback Looping- You should be focusing on this more. This is the backbone of AI generated tests. Less competitive as compare to their nitche players > > Good, but i think product should be taking a deep review of the other good players in market like TestIM, Promptfoo.com for different features. From there they can get some references \& get good features implemented. ----- ### "Def worth the money, some things could be better\!" — 4.0/5 > **Oleksiy** | *23 mars 2026* | Marketing et publicité | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I use BrowserStack to test sites, HTML5 creatives, and other things related to HTML behavior on devices. I like that there are so many different devices to choose from, as well as a variety of browsers and browser versions available. It's super helpful and all of that works well with VPN too. The initial account setup was very easy, and we had an account manager to assist us. > > **Inconvénients**: The network console is often buggy and does not capture network events sometimes. The console would also oftentimes get disconnected, which means that you have to re-start the device. > > Overall, the experience is rather positive and the tool is very helpful especially for mobile tests. It helps to bypass bot-traffic blocks, providing a reliable testing environment compared to emulators. ----- ### "Great Tool for Mobile Automation Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Shubham** | *15 octobre 2025* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I would say the ease of initial setup, Jenkins and Github Actions integrations and the ability to quickly debug different test logs in case of failures by looking at the videos for the test runs. > > **Inconvénients**: Once every few months, we do run into false failures due to a bad state on the device but generally it gets addressed quite quickly. > > We use BrowserStack to do automated testing of our Android App in conjunction with Espresso and Android Instrumentation test framework. We have quite a complex app and a lot of automated tests around it that we run on every PR with a Jenkins integration. The overall setup has been quite helpful for us to catch any bugs on the Github PR itself and has helped greatly in increasing our app stability and stopped us from shipping critical bugs on a lot of occasions. The overall experience of setup and running BrowserStack has been quite easy for us. ----- Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées