--- description: Cradle : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur Cradle, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Cradle - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion des exigences](/directory/967/requirements-management/software) > [Cradle](/software/128627/cradle) # Cradle Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/128627/cradle Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/128627/cradle?page=2) > Cradle est une solution de gestion des besoins conçue pour aider les entreprises à créer, mettre en relation et publier des informations pour toutes les étapes des projets d'ingénierie. La solution permet aux administrateurs de créer des documents avec des mises en page définies par l'utilisateur et de surveiller les bogues, les défauts et les problèmes dans le système. > > Conclusion : 27 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.4/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.4/5** | 27 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 3.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: 3SL - **Pays**: Barrow-in-Furness, R.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1987 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 449,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Windows (ordinateur), Linux (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Albanie, Allemagne, Andorre, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Australie, Autriche, Bahamas, Barbade, Belgique, Belize, Biélorussie, Bosnie-Herzégovine, Brésil, Bulgarie, Canada, Chine, Chypre, Corée du Sud, Croatie, Danemark et 59 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - API - Attributs définis par les parties prenantes - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Définition des priorités - Examen des exigences - Fonction de glisser-déposer - Gestion de versions - Gestion des changements - Gestion des documents - Gestion des fichiers - Gestion des modèles - Gestion des tâches - Gestion du cycle de vie - Importation et exportation de données - Liste de tâches (to-do list) - Modèles personnalisables - Méthodes Agiles - Outils de collaboration - Planification de projets - Projections ## Intégrations (1 au total) - Microsoft Word ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion des exigences](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/967/requirements-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2039027/reqsuite-rm) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 2. [Aha\!](https://www.getapp.fr/software/106671/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) 3. [Confluence](https://www.getapp.fr/software/90949/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3678 reviews) 4. [ReqView](https://www.getapp.fr/software/110317/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 5. [Jira](https://www.getapp.fr/software/9953/jira) — 4.4/5 (15358 reviews) ## Avis ### "Customers In Mind" — 5.0/5 > **Sarah** | *30 août 2018* | Aviation et industrie aéronautique | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The developers kept the customer in mind when creating the tool. The user interface is very accommodating and easy to use. Capability to collaborate with other tools very helpful and a top requirement when choosing the right tool. The customer service is excellent\! Always available and willing to work with the customer to the needs. > > **Inconvénients**: I have not run into any cons. I’m impressed with the tool. > > I’m extremely impressed with the tool. I even enjoy having the capability to work in a sandbox area for practice. Training to excellent\! ----- ### "Requirements Engineering Software - could not manage without it" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *30 août 2018* | Hôpitaux et soins de santé | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Designed to manage engineering and operational requirements first. Will handle software requirements as well, but I like the fact that it uses terms recognised by civil, mechanical, electrical, marine, aerospace, automotive, nuclear engineers. Second important plus point is its graphical capability. To be able to show how a requirement links to a process or an organisation brings the whole subject of RE to life making it so much simpler to ensure users can record all their requirements and that they can verify that they have been met. > > **Inconvénients**: The user interface is very traditional and is ready for a facelift. It works well for requirements engineers but is not as intuitive as would be needed for infrequent access and use by business users. > > From the initial engagement with the staff at 3SL through implementation and support we have been well supported. The few gaps we found for our particular use of have been filled as an enhancement, initially for us, but then will become part of the core product. A very responsive organisation. The flexibility of its metamodel (Schema) has allowed us to extend our use well beyond traditional Requirements Engineering. Where will Cradle take us next? ----- ### "Cradle Life" — 3.0/5 > **Thomas** | *29 août 2018* | Divertissement | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Modeling, Requirement Management, Click and Drag objects. Can support almost any SE task. Full SE life-cycle support capabilities. > > **Inconvénients**: Performance, Web Access, Older looking, Proprietary Database, Difficult to integrate with other systems. Sometimes that amount of functionality makes it hard to remember how to use the system unless you are in it every day. > > I have been working with Cradle for the past 12 years and have not found a SE tool with Cradles functionality. Other tools do not allow you to follow the complete System Engineering Process from Modeling all the way to retirement. ----- ### "Usage and Administration of CRADLE" — 5.0/5 > **Frank** | *30 août 2018* | Fabrication électrique/électronique | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It covers almost every task you may encounter during requirements management process. If you get used to the interface it is very flexible and can easily be adopted to specific needs. The text format of the Cradle export files allows a lot of additional (specific) data processing. > > **Inconvénients**: Actually I'm missing privileges to restrict link management (especially deleting a link). For people typically working with Microsoft Office application, the usage of CRADLE requires a change in mindset (but this may also be a 'Pros'). The upgrade process is really challenging for our IT. The direct connection of server and client version leads to a 1-day shutdown of CRADLE and parallel distributing of the clients to a lot of computers. The Document Publisher is really hard to use. Template definition requires a lot of effert and experiments until it is running. The publishing process is too time consuming. > > I think its a perfect tool to implement a process for requirements engineering at least to the level we are using it. (We don't do any modelling os far, also no systems engineering.) ----- ### "A very valuable and customizable RM Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *30 août 2018* | Pétrole et énergies | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: CRADLE is a very mature solution, pefectly suitable for large scale requirements engineering projects. It can perfectly be adapted to any business model, process, allowing very specific customization (using an API for interface developments interacting with the tools database). Data access control can be tailored to match a projects organization, data configuration management is very precisely ensured. A wide range of file formats is proposed for interfaces with the external world (for imports, exports, or as attachments) 3SL Team offers a very good support and service when required. > > **Inconvénients**: The interface of the client could be considered as a bit stark and old fashioned. (we did not worked with web interfaces) Unfortunately, only one baseline can be open at a time, validated alternatives could only be managed using distinct objects. User experience for Verification \& Validation process (using workflows) could be enhanced (reviews by validator is to be preferably done using XLS exports) Source document import using Doc Loader (Word format) can be a difficult experience for docs with complex structure, and could allow more possibilities (table patterns) ----- Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/128627/cradle?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/128627/cradle) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées