--- description: Foothold : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur Foothold, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Foothold - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels d'action sociale](/directory/1527/social-work-case-management/software) > [Foothold](/software/128323/awards) # Foothold Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/128323/awards Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/128323/awards?page=2) > AWARDS est une solution de gestion des dossiers médicaux partagés et des services sociaux, qui aide les organismes de soins de santé à gérer le support client, la facturation, la sécurité des données, etc. Elle permet aux responsables de personnaliser les plans de services, les formulaires et les rapports, ainsi que de rationaliser les opérations pour les équipes d'assistance et de formation. > > Conclusion : 51 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 51 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Radicle Health - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2004 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 2 000,00 $US - **Public cible**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - API - Audit des dossiers clients - Autopaiement - Autorisations basées sur les rôles - Base de données de contacts - Cabinet de plusieurs praticiens - Certification et licences - Champs personnalisables - Confirmations/Reminders - Conforme HIPAA - Contrôle MDS - Dossier médical informatisé et partagé - Dossiers d'antécédents médicaux - Emplacements multiples - Facturation - Facturation médicale - Fonctions pour aides à domicile - Fonctions pour maisons de repos - For Mental/Behavioral Health - Formulaires personnalisables ## Intégrations (1 au total) - Quest ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels d'action sociale](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1527/social-work-case-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels d'action sociale](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1527/social-work-case-management/software) - [Logiciels pour psychologues](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/71/mental-health/software) - [Logiciels pour services à la personne](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1173/human-services/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des cas médicaux](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/815/patient-case-management/software) - [Logiciels pour établissements de soins de longue durée](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/911/long-term-care/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [LEAP](https://www.getapp.fr/software/104595/leap) — 4.3/5 (541 reviews) 2. [Clio](https://www.getapp.fr/software/91415/clio) — 4.7/5 (1726 reviews) 3. [8am MyCase](https://www.getapp.fr/software/91266/mycase) — 4.6/5 (790 reviews) 4. [Bonterra Apricot](https://www.getapp.fr/software/120783/apricot) — 4.2/5 (226 reviews) 5. [Smokeball](https://www.getapp.fr/software/104317/smokeball) — 4.8/5 (358 reviews) ## Avis ### "So many different programs" — 4.0/5 > **Astrid** | *7 février 2020* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I have worked at several big agencies that have a multitude of types of programs, state regulations and internal regulations that this system allows me to gather information from all on a consistent basis. Creating reports is easy and any type can be made\! I can create reports for the board or for individual front line staff to give them feedback. I can look at one program, subset of programs by type or all at once (homeless, veterans, DV, shelters, incidents, senior, meals on wheels, group homes, etc.) > > **Inconvénients**: The system has so much more potential and while they are trying to improve each section, I wish it would be faster but not from lack of trying. There just isn't enough time in the day. > > I have had the pleasure of working with AWARDS since 2009 and any time an agency had to undergo the process of selection of an EHR, AWARDS was what was selected. It's the best bang for your buck. While I didn't get certified until a few years ago, it was an easy enough system that I could be an administrator for my agency and really create processes that streamlined my programs. I didn't need to implement all programs at once or implement one module across the board, it allowed for me to plan, test, and rework things without having an external deadline. Most importantly, this could not have been possible without the staff at Foothold. They took the time to explain things thoroughly, discuss potential other uses and guide me if I was stuck. When changes were implemented because of regulations, they helped us navigate that and if they were making changes they communicated those too. They provide the vision to all users and accept input. Staff are knowledgeable about programming and offer more than one option of doing things in the system. Having several options also helps with it's user friendliness, you can get to the same destination from different paths and not break anything in the system while doing so. They have build in lots of safeguards for this too. ----- ### "longtime positive user" — 5.0/5 > **shearon** | *5 janvier 2024* | Organisme social ou civique | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I like most about foothold is the ability to speak with someone about your issues. I have worked with AWARDS for many years and have always received assistance in a timely manner. The people are great to work with and knowledgeable about the product. > > **Inconvénients**: We were afraid of the product, but with some help, on-site support and ability to speak and or email members at foothold we became more comfortable with AWARDS. At this time there is nothing that I can name that I do not like. > > My overall experience with foothold has been very positive. ----- ### "AWARDS Review" — 4.0/5 > **Dani** | *29 avril 2019* | Psychologie | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I like best is that AWARDS has a feature called "formbuilder" which literally does what the name implies. I can take any existing form my organization uses and "build" it into AWARDS using a user friendly platform to select drop down boxes, text boxes, etc. This form can then be added to different parts of the systems such as client face sheet, progress notes, etc. > > **Inconvénients**: A few parts of the system are clunky. For example, there is a charting timetable where reminder events can be scheduled so that staff get tickler alerts. However, this module doesn't "talk" to the module where the actual event (an assessment, for example) is actually done. So the process of keeping the timetable updated with completion dates is a totally manual process. It would be more efficient for staff if this was automated like their PlanBuilder (Treatment/Service Plan)module is. > > Overall we have had a good experience with AWARDS. We've had a consistent Project Manager since implementation 10 years ago. The helpdesk staff are responsive and helpful. My only criticism is that sometimes Foothold will make changes to the system without consultation with users. Obviously not every enhancement and upgrade needs user approval but for ones that have massive impact on users, there should be a forum for discussion and piloting. Sometimes they do this but not always. ----- ### "AWARDS is a great Electronic Health Record" — 5.0/5 > **Melodie** | *6 décembre 2023* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Their customer services and the timely and helpful replies from their Help Desk. > > **Inconvénients**: Some of the features in AWARDS have not yet been updated and are clunky. But I've been told they will be updated in the future. ----- ### "Foothold Technology a Great Choice\!" — 5.0/5 > **Vickie** | *22 novembre 2023* | Psychologie | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Foothold Technology is a platform that can be modified to meet an agencies specific needs. It offers an easy-to-use platform for staff of various backgrounds and education level. > > **Inconvénients**: Sometimes it takes a while to get helpdesk issues resolved. > > RSS has worked with Foothold Technology since 2008. The assistance with start up and the on-going support has been great. They are always willing to listen to thoughts and ideas on how to improve the system. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/128323/awards?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/128323/awards) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Données structurées