--- description: Foothold : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur Foothold, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Foothold - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels d'action sociale](/directory/1527/social-work-case-management/software) > [Foothold](/software/128323/awards) # Foothold Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/128323/awards Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/128323/awards?page=2) > AWARDS est une solution de gestion des dossiers médicaux partagés et des services sociaux, qui aide les organismes de soins de santé à gérer le support client, la facturation, la sécurité des données, etc. Elle permet aux responsables de personnaliser les plans de services, les formulaires et les rapports, ainsi que de rationaliser les opérations pour les équipes d'assistance et de formation. > > Conclusion : 51 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 51 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Radicle Health - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2004 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 2 000,00 $US - **Public cible**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - API - Audit des dossiers clients - Autopaiement - Autorisations basées sur les rôles - Base de données de contacts - Cabinet de plusieurs praticiens - Certification et licences - Champs personnalisables - Confirmations/Reminders - Conforme HIPAA - Contrôle MDS - Dossier médical informatisé et partagé - Dossiers d'antécédents médicaux - Emplacements multiples - Facturation - Facturation médicale - Fonctions pour aides à domicile - Fonctions pour maisons de repos - For Mental/Behavioral Health - Formulaires personnalisables ## Intégrations (1 au total) - Quest ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels d'action sociale](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1527/social-work-case-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels d'action sociale](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1527/social-work-case-management/software) - [Logiciels pour psychologues](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/71/mental-health/software) - [Logiciels pour services à la personne](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1173/human-services/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des cas médicaux](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/815/patient-case-management/software) - [Logiciels pour établissements de soins de longue durée](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/911/long-term-care/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [TheraNest](https://www.getapp.fr/software/102857/theranest-mental-health) — 4.4/5 (1051 reviews) 2. [Bonterra Apricot](https://www.getapp.fr/software/120783/apricot) — 4.2/5 (226 reviews) 3. [Bonterra Penelope](https://www.getapp.fr/software/108603/penelope) — 4.2/5 (75 reviews) 4. [PlanStreet](https://www.getapp.fr/software/129007/planstreet) — 4.4/5 (45 reviews) 5. [NewOrg](https://www.getapp.fr/software/105643/neworg) — 4.8/5 (75 reviews) ## Avis ### "Great product and support" — 5.0/5 > **Ryan** | *11 décembre 2023* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: This site is easy to use, constantly being updated, well maintained, and works well with our billing needs. > > **Inconvénients**: Some areas could use an update and to be adjusted to match the new UI but they are constantly working on this issue and have made large adjustments recently. ----- ### "Solid quality, user-friendly, flexible for reporting\!" — 4.0/5 > **Bessy** | *28 février 2020* | Psychologie | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Absolutely simplified and saved time on billing tasks. Form Builder is also an indispensable feature for our agency. We constantly build customized forms/reports to assist is funding/accountability efforts. In addition Help Desk could respond a bit faster at times. > > **Inconvénients**: Our agency chooses not to use the calendar feature due to it's complexity. > > The relationship/trust building at the beginning was essential for the buy in. Thankfully that foundation was well established and continues to this day. ----- ### "AWARDS Review" — 4.0/5 > **Dani** | *29 avril 2019* | Psychologie | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I like best is that AWARDS has a feature called "formbuilder" which literally does what the name implies. I can take any existing form my organization uses and "build" it into AWARDS using a user friendly platform to select drop down boxes, text boxes, etc. This form can then be added to different parts of the systems such as client face sheet, progress notes, etc. > > **Inconvénients**: A few parts of the system are clunky. For example, there is a charting timetable where reminder events can be scheduled so that staff get tickler alerts. However, this module doesn't "talk" to the module where the actual event (an assessment, for example) is actually done. So the process of keeping the timetable updated with completion dates is a totally manual process. It would be more efficient for staff if this was automated like their PlanBuilder (Treatment/Service Plan)module is. > > Overall we have had a good experience with AWARDS. We've had a consistent Project Manager since implementation 10 years ago. The helpdesk staff are responsive and helpful. My only criticism is that sometimes Foothold will make changes to the system without consultation with users. Obviously not every enhancement and upgrade needs user approval but for ones that have massive impact on users, there should be a forum for discussion and piloting. Sometimes they do this but not always. ----- ### "Best Tool for HMIS" — 5.0/5 > **Joan** | *20 novembre 2023* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Foothold's customer service is excellent and they are at the forefront of new products and system usage. > > **Inconvénients**: The design of the bed inventory is complicated and difficult to manage. I understand that it is the design required by the federal agency, but it is tedious to update the inventory changes. ----- ### "Long time AWARDS user" — 5.0/5 > **Julie** | *16 août 2024* | Psychologie | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The work flow fits us well. It is easy to teach new hires because after hitting update the prompts are easy to know where to go next. > > **Inconvénients**: Some of the report features will not allow you to use the back button. It takes you back to having to start over for each program you are trying to run. > > 24 years total of using and it gets better all the time. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/128323/awards?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/128323/awards) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Données structurées