--- description: Ideagen Please Review : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur Ideagen Please Review, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Ideagen Please Review - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Outils collaboratifs](/directory/335/web-collaboration/software) > [Ideagen Please Review](/software/121535/ideagen-proposal-management-software) # Ideagen Please Review Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/121535/ideagen-proposal-management-software > Ideagen PleaseReview est un logiciel de révision, de cocréation et de rédaction de documents conçu pour aider les utilisateurs à rationaliser et à gérer le processus de création de propositions, à aider les équipes à produire des documents rapidement et en toute sécurité grâce à des outils de collaboration en temps réel, à un accès sécurisé aux documents internes/externes, etc. > > Conclusion : 4 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 4 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Ideagen - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1993 ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Australie, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Accès hors ligne - Alertes/Notifications - Autorisations basées sur les rôles - Contrôle de qualité - Contrôle du processus d'approbation - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Document Check-in/Check-out - Examen de documents - Gestion de la conformité - Gestion de versions - Gestion des appels d'offres - Gestion des audits - Gestion des changements - Gestion des contacts - Gestion des documents - Historique des révisions - Modèles - Notes et commentaires - Outils de collaboration - Rappels ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - Support téléphonique ## Category - [Outils collaboratifs](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/335/web-collaboration/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Outils collaboratifs](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/335/web-collaboration/software) - [Logiciels de collaboration de contenu](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/3796/content-collaboration/software) - [Logiciels d'appel d'offres](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/340/proposal-management/software) - [Logiciels de gestion documentaire](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/284/document-management/software) - [Logiciels GED (gestion électronique de documents)](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1175/document-control/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Zoho Sign](https://www.getapp.fr/software/112435/zoho-sign) — 4.5/5 (84 reviews) 2. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.getapp.fr/software/104305/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (527 reviews) 3. [M-Files](https://www.getapp.fr/software/91125/m-files-dms) — 4.4/5 (274 reviews) 4. [DigiSigner](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2052053/digisigner) — 4.8/5 (1450 reviews) 5. [Qualio](https://www.getapp.fr/software/100136/qualio) — 4.6/5 (128 reviews) ## Avis ### "Useful but there's room for improvement" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *16 février 2023* | Produits pharmaceutiques | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Being able to review a document in parallel with internal and external colleagues. > > **Inconvénients**: It would be useful to be able to magnify the document to fit the type of screen it is viewed on and to quickly get to specific comments that colleagues have replied to without scrolling through the document. > > Good but could be better with some small improvements. ----- ### "Validation of PleaseReview for Veeva vault integration for a client" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *22 septembre 2025* | Produits pharmaceutiques | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: i had supported a client in validation of PleaseReview with Veeva Vault. We had generated UAT Test Scripts with scenarios where we routed documents for collab authoring cycle and review of the documents. The integration was easy and and showed the users what changes/updates are being made and the Author could accept/reject them with reason or not. Good tool to have real time updates being made on a document which assisted in reducing the time to review the document with stakeholders. > > **Inconvénients**: A couple of things I noticed while dry running the UAT scripts is how the document is displayed when opened in PleaseReview. We had created a sample test document with grammatical errors and mistakes so as to have them updated in collab authoring cycle. if the paragraph is short on a single page document the UI shows only that section zoomed in and not the whole page as compared to in Microsoft word document. It would be better if it showed the whole page while making any updates. Also the Header and Footer are not displayed when a user opens the document for review or collab authoring cycle. would like to see that too in future updates. > > We validated PleaseReview with Veeva Vault QMS for collaborative authoring and review cycles. The integration was smooth and made it easy for users to see real-time updates and accept or reject changes, which really sped up stakeholder reviews. A couple of areas for improvement would be showing the full page (instead of zooming in on short sections) and displaying headers/footers during reviews. Overall, it’s a very useful tool that made the document review process much more efficient. ----- ### "Works great for Color Team Reviews" — 5.0/5 > **Brittony** | *9 octobre 2020* | Aviation et industrie aéronautique | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I use PleaseReview for Red Team reviews. I load my documents into the software, give authorization to my reviewers all over the company and they can enter comments, show how they would edit text and determine if it's minor or major. Reviewers see each other's comments and can discuss differences. I can determine how long the reviewers have to review and then download the document back into Word with comments. > > **Inconvénients**: We tried to use it as a collaborative vehicle for writing and it didn't work very well for that. Each author had to be assigned a section and then it got complicated. We abandoned that path. One issue we have is authorizing people outside or heritage group after we merged with another company. Only heritage can use it. > > We use it for all our non-advocate reviews and it works great for those we can give access to. ----- ### "Great software and must try\!\!" — 5.0/5 > **Allison** | *4 avril 2025* | Aviation et industrie aéronautique | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Inconvénients**: Not sure as I am only a user. Everything works well for me > > Its user friendly and you can do what you need for your business. The people are easy to work with. Responsive ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/121535/ideagen-proposal-management-software) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Données structurées