--- description: TestMu AI : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur TestMu AI, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: TestMu AI - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de test automatisé](/directory/389/testing/software) > [TestMu AI](/software/111387/lambdatest) # TestMu AI Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/111387/lambdatest Page : 1/23\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/111387/lambdatest?page=2) > Testez vos applications web publiques ou hébergées localement sur plus de 2 000 navigateurs, systèmes d'exploitation, résolutions et appareils différents de manière transparente avec LambdaTest. > > Conclusion : 545 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 545 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: LambdaTest - **Pays**: San Francisco, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2017 ## Contexte commercial - **Prix à partir de**: 15,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (pendant l'essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Anguilla, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Aruba, Australie, Autriche, Bahamas, Barbade, Belgique, Belize, Bermudes, Bulgarie, Canada, Chypre, Costa Rica, Cuba, Danemark, Dominique, Espagne et 43 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - API - Alertes/Notifications - Assurance qualité - Champs personnalisables - Débogage - Déplacement et copie - Gestion de projets - Gestion des affectations - Gestion des backlogs - Gestion des exigences - Gestion des problèmes - Gestion des tests de logiciels - Gestion des tâches - Gestion des évaluations - Monitoring - Méthodes Agiles - Outils de collaboration - Piste d'audit - Prise en charge de l'exécution parallèle - Programmation des tâches ## Intégrations (15 au total) - Asana - Bitbucket - CircleCI - GitHub - GitLab - Hive - Jira - MantisBT - Microsoft Visual Studio - Paymo - Slack - Teamwork.com - Trello - WordPress - monday.com ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) ## Category - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/389/testing/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/389/testing/software) - [Logiciels de bug tracking](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Logiciels de test de performance](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/1299/performance-testing/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [ACCELQ](https://www.getapp.fr/software/111257/accelq) — 4.9/5 (135 reviews) 2. [BrowserStack](https://www.getapp.fr/software/170655/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (774 reviews) 3. [QA Wolf](https://www.getapp.fr/software/2047371/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (69 reviews) 4. [Centercode](https://www.getapp.fr/software/119099/centercode) — 4.2/5 (77 reviews) 5. [WebLOAD](https://www.getapp.fr/software/1999307/webload) — 4.2/5 (9 reviews) ## Avis ### "Regression and Cross Browser Testing" — 4.0/5 > **Rodgers** | *12 janvier 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I use LambdaTest frequently for both regression and cross browser testing, and it has genuinely simplified my day to day work. Launching different browser and OS combinations is fast, and it’s a big plus that I no longer need to manage a separate device lab or multiple virtual machines. Overall performance is reliable, and running tests in parallel has noticeably reduced our execution time during busy sprint periods. > > **Inconvénients**: The interface, however, can sometimes feel a little busy, particularly when trying to sift through logs or older session records. I’ve also run into a few instances where test sessions were slightly sluggish, which can be annoying when dealing with timing sensitive defects. With smoother navigation and more flexible, configurable reporting screens, it would align even more naturally with my QA workflow. > > Overall performance is reliable, and running tests in parallel has noticeably reduced our execution time during busy sprint periods. I definitely would recommend the tool. ----- ### "A Reliable and Feature-Rich Platform for Cross-Browser Testing" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur anonyme** | *19 juin 2025* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: LambdaTest has excellent cross-browser testing with good support for browsers and devices along with easy integrations. A few instances of performance hiccups and pricing problems stop this from a flawless 5 stars but otherwise make for a sound and operational platform. > > **Inconvénients**: What I liked most about LambdaTest is its wide range of real browsers and devices, which ensures thorough compatibility testing. The platform is easy to use, and setting up live and automated tests is simple. I also appreciate its strong integration support with tools like GitHub, Jira, Slack, and CI/CD pipelines. Visual regression testing and smart UI testing features are also incredibly helpful for frontend teams. > > Occasionally, sessions take time to load, especially when accessing older browsers or emulated mobile devices. The automated screenshot tool sometimes has rendering inconsistencies, and network throttling settings could offer more flexibility. Also, for startups or small teams, the pricing might feel high unless all advanced features are regularly used. ----- ### "Good tool for manual testing" — 3.0/5 > **Somesh** | *24 avril 2025* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I’ve used it across different devices – from mobile to various browsers and operating systems – and it supports most of the devices we use. > > **Inconvénients**: It is very slow making it difficult to use. > > Overall, LambdaTest is good for testing individual elements. As a tester, I find it useful for verifying UI components across different browsers. However, every time I use it, the performance is noticeably slow compared to real devices. For full end-to-end testing, it becomes frustrating and time-consuming. ----- ### "TestMU AI Review" — 5.0/5 > **Aastha** | *26 février 2026* | Études de marché | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Excellent support for testing across a wide range of devices and browsers, making cross-platform checks easy. Helps catch compatibility issues early by letting you run the same link on different environments. Saves time compared to maintaining your own device lab. Simple and intuitive interface — tests are easy to set up and run. Reliable cloud-based access means the team can test from anywhere without hardware constraints. > > **Inconvénients**: Can feel overwhelming at first due to the number of options available. Test results can sometimes feel delayed under heavy load times (depends on plan/parallel sessions). > > TestMU AI has been super helpful for our QA process. Their wide support for multiple devices and browsers lets us quickly check our links across different environments without any hassle. It saves us time, catches issues early, and makes our testing way more reliable. ----- ### "No brainer compared to BrowserStack" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas** | *17 février 2025* | Formation professionnelle et coaching | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Improvements come thick and fast. The support is incredible. It just works :) > > **Inconvénients**: No real issues at all. Would always like things to be cheaper but can't complain as it's competitive. > > Onboarding are great. Sales team aren't annoying like BrowserStack. Would recommend to anyone. ----- Page : 1/23\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/111387/lambdatest?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/111387/lambdatest) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Données structurées