--- description: Submittable : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur Submittable, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Submittable - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels pour l'administration publique](/directory/669/public-sector/software) > [Submittable](/software/107673/submittable) # Submittable Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/107673/submittable Page : 1/17\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/107673/submittable?page=2) > Submittable est une plateforme de gestion des soumissions en ligne qui simplifie la façon dont les entreprises et institutions peuvent accepter, examiner et prendre des décisions relatives aux candidatures depuis un emplacement centralisé. > > Conclusion : 398 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.8/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.8/5** | 398 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Submittable - **Pays**: Missoula, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2010 ## Contexte commercial - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais, espagnol - **Pays disponibles**: Australie, Canada, Irlande, Nouvelle-Zélande, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - API - Accès mobile - Alertes/Notifications - Analyse des campagnes - Analyse visuelle - Authentification unique - Autorisations basées sur les rôles - Base de données de membres - Base de données des employés - Biométrie - Budgétisation et prévision - CRM - Catégorisation/regroupement - Champs personnalisables - Chat et messagerie - Communication multicanal - Comptabilité - Comptabilité des fonds - Concours de talents (photo, design, etc.) - Contrôle des budgets ## Intégrations (21 au total) - ActiveCampaign - Airtable - Bloomerang - Dynamics 365 - Gmail - Google Drive - Google Sheets - Invoice Ninja - Jira - Mailchimp - Mailjet - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Notion - Salesforce Platform ... et 6 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels pour l'administration publique](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/669/public-sector/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels pour l'administration publique](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/669/public-sector/software) - [Logiciels de collecte de fonds](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/169/fundraising/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des dons](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/167/donation-management/software) - [Logiciels de vérification d'identité](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/3854/identity-verification/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des subventions](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/170/grant-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Good Grants](https://www.getapp.fr/software/160227/good-grants) — 4.8/5 (21 reviews) 2. [Sage Intacct](https://www.getapp.fr/software/10360/intacct) — 4.3/5 (713 reviews) 3. [Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.getapp.fr/software/105791/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) — 4.3/5 (95 reviews) 4. [Little Green Light](https://www.getapp.fr/software/90417/little-green-light) — 4.8/5 (316 reviews) 5. [Grants Management](https://www.getapp.fr/software/107929/grants-united) — 4.6/5 (19 reviews) ## Avis ### "It provides me with all necessary services as a submitter. It provides all I require as an editor." — 5.0/5 > **Jeff** | *6 octobre 2017* > > **Avantages**: Submittable is convenient. As a submitter, it provides efficient mechanisms for making submissions and efficient tracking of those submissions. As an editor, it provides me with notices and updates to allow me to process submissions quickly and efficiently. Submittable is practical. As a submitter, a single page allows me to keep track of active submissions to several publications. As an editor, the features for reaction and response to submitters makes my job much easier. Submittable is uncomplicated, easily used, and easy to understand. As a submitter, these qualities make submissions tracking manageable. Submittable is used widely enough to be familiar to virtually all writers and artists who submit work for publication. > > **Inconvénients**: Our current package allows only 5 of our team members to have access to submissions. I could wish for more relaxed limits in that regard. ----- ### "Wize Way to Manage: A Grant Management Game Changer" — 5.0/5 > **Kristen** | *5 juin 2024* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I appreciate most was the intuitive dashboard menu, which will allow our organization to effortlessly track and manage our grants. The interface for admin staff, external reviewer, and grantees is easy to navigate. The robust reporting features offer valuable insights, enabling us to make data-driven decisions and optimize our grant management process. The customizable workflows have allowed us to tailor the system to our unique needs, which we believe will result in enhanced efficiency. Additionally, I am impressed by the exceptional customer support provided by the WizeHive team, who are always responsive and helpful as I've needed assistance during the onboarding process. > > **Inconvénients**: While I'm extremely pleased with our WizeHive subscription, we encountered some drawbacks during the onboarding process. Specifically, I discovered a few features mentioned in our initial sales call were not part of our subscription package and would require an additional fee, which was prohibitively expensive for our small organization. Also, some key functionalities that tipped the scales for us in favor of WizeHive over other grant management systems are not yet available but are expected to be added in future updates. > > Overall, I'm delighted with WizeHive and would highly recommend the NextZen platform to anyone seeking a reliable, user-friendly, and comprehensive grant management solution. By investing in this technology, we will elevate the experience for all stakeholders within our organization and ensure that our processes and tools reflect our grantee partnership objectives. ----- ### "Submittable is user-friendly, but only for applicants." — 2.0/5 > **Sydney** | *22 septembre 2022* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 3.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The product is easy for applicants to use, with simple forms and clear application guidelines. Generally, we have had many applicants have no issues while applying, which is definitely a positive about the platform. > > **Inconvénients**: For administrative staff who work grant programs on the back-end, features such as advanced reporting are sorely lacking. It's difficult to build these reports and pull through the data you need. Additionally, there are many small issues that Submittable merely provides "work-arounds" for, rather than solving problems. For example - tables that are put directly into an application form export as a separate file, and then would need to be merged in order to package applications. While the platform might make the process of applying smooth for applicants, there seem to always be headaches for our staff when processing applications afterwards. ----- ### "Great customer service and fast setup" — 5.0/5 > **Daniel** | *18 octobre 2023* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: We had a last-minute need for an online granting process and needed an affordable tool where we could get everything running quickly with minimal input from our end. Even though their development times are typically longer, they were willing to adapt to our timeline and still delivered the forms a week earlier\! Throughout the entire process, their support team has been amazing--always available, always happy to help and incredibly fast to turn things around. We hardly had to do any of the development ourselves, despite this being a last-minute request. As a small team with limited spare capacity, this was a lifesaver in being able to keep to our grantmaking timeline. > > **Inconvénients**: While the functionalities are enough for most organizations' granting needs, there are a few customization options, such as greater flexibility with repeating questions, which we would have liked. However, the support team helped us find acceptable workarounds. > > This product has significantly reduced the administrative time we spend on grantmaking. We have more than earned back the cost of the license in time saved. ----- ### "The right tool for the jobs" — 5.0/5 > **Derrick** | *20 février 2024* | Enseignement primaire et secondaire | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I love the clean design, ease of use, and functionality. The projects and forms are easy to create, highly customizable, and user-friendly for clientele. The ease to which project assignments can be made and tracked is another great feature. We started using Submittable to help us manage a sizable photography contest, and have since been finding ways to migrate other activities/contests (like public speaking, leadership applications, and videography to name a few) into this platform. > > **Inconvénients**: I would like to see some type of organizational structure within forms, projects, and the team to help keep different groups or activities separated. Currently, those lists are becoming quite long and clutter up the pages. A folder system would be ideal that might include activity groups as well as a means to archive forms and projects. Perhaps to help de-clutter, I would like for other teams admins to only see the projects, forms, and reports they created. Team member A doesn't need to see everything that team member B has created. Unless they are a level 5, they only need to see their own work. > > From the product itself to the prompt customer service, everything about Submittable has been very positive. The system functions as advertised and it has enabled our youth development program to administer what has historically been in-person events and activities into a digital format. That has saved time and travel expenses for our employees and volunteers. ----- Page : 1/17\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/107673/submittable?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/107673/submittable) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées