--- description: Submittable : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur Submittable, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Submittable - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels pour l'administration publique](/directory/669/public-sector/software) > [Submittable](/software/107673/submittable) # Submittable Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/107673/submittable Page : 1/17\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/107673/submittable?page=2) > Submittable est une plateforme de gestion des soumissions en ligne qui simplifie la façon dont les entreprises et institutions peuvent accepter, examiner et prendre des décisions relatives aux candidatures depuis un emplacement centralisé. > > Conclusion : 398 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.8/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.8/5** | 398 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Submittable - **Pays**: Missoula, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2010 ## Contexte commercial - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais, espagnol - **Pays disponibles**: Australie, Canada, Irlande, Nouvelle-Zélande, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - API - Accès mobile - Alertes/Notifications - Analyse des campagnes - Analyse visuelle - Authentification unique - Automatisation des processus et flux de travail - Autorisations basées sur les rôles - Base de données de membres - Base de données des employés - Biométrie - Budgétisation et prévision - CRM - Catégorisation/regroupement - Champs personnalisables - Chat et messagerie - Communication multicanal - Comptabilité - Comptabilité des fonds - Concours de talents (photo, design, etc.) ## Intégrations (21 au total) - ActiveCampaign - Airtable - Bloomerang - Dynamics 365 - Gmail - Google Drive - Google Sheets - Invoice Ninja - Jira - Mailchimp - Mailjet - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Notion - Salesforce Platform ... et 6 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels pour l'administration publique](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/669/public-sector/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels pour l'administration publique](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/669/public-sector/software) - [Logiciels de collecte de fonds](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/169/fundraising/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des dons](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/167/donation-management/software) - [Logiciels de vérification d'identité](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/3854/identity-verification/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des subventions](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/170/grant-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Good Grants](https://www.getapp.fr/software/160227/good-grants) — 4.8/5 (21 reviews) 2. [Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.getapp.fr/software/105791/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) — 4.3/5 (95 reviews) 3. [Sage Intacct](https://www.getapp.fr/software/10360/intacct) — 4.3/5 (684 reviews) 4. [Little Green Light](https://www.getapp.fr/software/90417/little-green-light) — 4.8/5 (316 reviews) 5. [Grants Management](https://www.getapp.fr/software/107929/grants-united) — 4.6/5 (19 reviews) ## Avis ### "The Best Decision for our Grant Management" — 5.0/5 > **Orsella** | *28 août 2023* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The customer service is unmatched. From billing to IT, messages are returned on the same day. For me, that is better than the program itself. I never speak to a BOT or an AI rep. I can actually still speak/email with a human and that makes me stay with Wizehive. > > **Inconvénients**: I haven't run into any issues using Wizehive. > > With Wizehive, the grant management process at our foundation has changed for the better drastically. To have 100's of grant applications in one place and be able to manage archived and current applications with ease has cut my work by more than half. ----- ### "New Impressed User" — 5.0/5 > **Savannah** | *23 juillet 2024* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: So far, our Implementation Manager has helped us solve all of the problem we have encountered and has taken our feedback seriously and passed it to the Dev team. Everyone is responsive and understanding and we feel like they really tried their best to make the product what we needed it to be to fit our program\! > > **Inconvénients**: There is a lot of room for improvements and development, so we look forward to seeing that progress as we start our journey with WizeHive\! ----- ### "Submittable is user-friendly, but only for applicants." — 2.0/5 > **Sydney** | *22 septembre 2022* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 3.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The product is easy for applicants to use, with simple forms and clear application guidelines. Generally, we have had many applicants have no issues while applying, which is definitely a positive about the platform. > > **Inconvénients**: For administrative staff who work grant programs on the back-end, features such as advanced reporting are sorely lacking. It's difficult to build these reports and pull through the data you need. Additionally, there are many small issues that Submittable merely provides "work-arounds" for, rather than solving problems. For example - tables that are put directly into an application form export as a separate file, and then would need to be merged in order to package applications. While the platform might make the process of applying smooth for applicants, there seem to always be headaches for our staff when processing applications afterwards. ----- ### "Positive Experience with WizeHive - Excellent training, support, and resources" — 5.0/5 > **Renee Sanders** | *17 juin 2024* | Services environnementaux | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: WizeHive has proven to be a wonderful solution for our program. We are currently running a large multi-year grant funding competition and needed a system that could meet our needs for proposal collection, application review, reporting, and other elements of grant management. WizeHive has been a perfect fit. The training experience with \[sensitive content hidden\] was excellent. \[sensitive content hidden\] always answered questions thoroughly and quickly solved problems as we worked together to create our first fully-functioning application portal. During our application acceptance period, no applicants reported having any issues with the WizeHive system. Everything worked so smoothly\! Reviewers have also had a smooth experience while reviewing applications. The support staff is also quick to response with helpful resources. > > **Inconvénients**: It would be nice if we could have the capacity to allow multiple files to be uploaded in one question in an application where relevant. > > Working with WizeHive has been a quality experience that has made grant and program management much easier for our team. We are thrilled to be working together over the next few years on our current program and look forward to looking for other efforts we could incorporate WizeHive into in the future. Administrators, applicants, and reviewers all report positive experiences with using WizeHive. ----- ### "Wize Way to Manage: A Grant Management Game Changer" — 5.0/5 > **Kristen** | *5 juin 2024* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I appreciate most was the intuitive dashboard menu, which will allow our organization to effortlessly track and manage our grants. The interface for admin staff, external reviewer, and grantees is easy to navigate. The robust reporting features offer valuable insights, enabling us to make data-driven decisions and optimize our grant management process. The customizable workflows have allowed us to tailor the system to our unique needs, which we believe will result in enhanced efficiency. Additionally, I am impressed by the exceptional customer support provided by the WizeHive team, who are always responsive and helpful as I've needed assistance during the onboarding process. > > **Inconvénients**: While I'm extremely pleased with our WizeHive subscription, we encountered some drawbacks during the onboarding process. Specifically, I discovered a few features mentioned in our initial sales call were not part of our subscription package and would require an additional fee, which was prohibitively expensive for our small organization. Also, some key functionalities that tipped the scales for us in favor of WizeHive over other grant management systems are not yet available but are expected to be added in future updates. > > Overall, I'm delighted with WizeHive and would highly recommend the NextZen platform to anyone seeking a reliable, user-friendly, and comprehensive grant management solution. By investing in this technology, we will elevate the experience for all stakeholders within our organization and ensure that our processes and tools reflect our grantee partnership objectives. ----- Page : 1/17\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/107673/submittable?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/107673/submittable) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées