--- description: Responsive : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis sur Responsive, consultez ses différents prix, tarifs et abonnements ainsi que ses fonctionnalités. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Responsive - Prix, tarif, abonnement et avis | GetApp France 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Outils de Knowledge Management](/directory/257/knowledge-management/software) > [Responsive](/software/103221/responsive) # Responsive Canonical: https://www.getapp.fr/software/103221/responsive Page : 1/8\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/103221/responsive?page=2) > Le logiciel d'appel d'offres de RFPIO, simple et bien pensé, facilite et automatise le processus de réponse, vous permettant ainsi de vous concentrer sur les questions les plus importantes. > > Conclusion : 172 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 172 Avis | | Simplicité d’utilisation | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Responsive (formerly RFPIO) - **Pays**: Beaverton, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2015 ## Contexte commercial - **Public cible**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, chinois, chinois traditionnel, coréen, danois, espagnol, finnois, français, grec, italien, japonais, néerlandais, polonais, portugais, russe, suédois - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne, Arabie saoudite, Australie, Autriche, Brésil, Canada, Danemark, Finlande, France, Inde, Israël, Koweït, Luxembourg, Mexique, Norvège, Nouvelle-Zélande, Pays-Bas, Qatar, Royaume-Uni, Singapour et 3 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - API - Alertes/Notifications - Authentification unique - Automatisation de documents - Automatisation des formulaires - Bibliothèque de connaissances - Bibliothèque de contenu - CRM - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Création d'appels d'offres - Examen de documents - Gestion de contenu - Gestion de la base de connaissances - Gestion de la communication - Gestion de projets - Gestion de versions - Gestion des appels d'offres - Gestion des contacts - Gestion des demandes - Gestion des documents ## Intégrations (26 au total) - Box - Cisco Duo - Dropbox Business - Google Chat - Google Drive - Highspot - HubSpot CRM - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft PowerPoint - Microsoft SharePoint - Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Word ... et 11 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Outils de Knowledge Management](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/257/knowledge-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Outils de Knowledge Management](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/257/knowledge-management/software) - [Logiciels BPM (Business Process Management)](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/273/business-process-management-bpm/software) - [Logiciels d'appel d'offres](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/340/proposal-management/software) - [Logiciels de workflow](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/566/business-workflow/software) - [Outils de gestion de projets](https://www.getapp.fr/directory/332/project-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [XaitPorter](https://www.getapp.fr/software/1665/xaitporter) — 4.6/5 (45 reviews) 2. [Axonaut](https://www.getapp.fr/software/132027/axonaut) — 4.6/5 (22 reviews) 3. [PandaDoc](https://www.getapp.fr/software/91467/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1243 reviews) 4. [Loopio](https://www.getapp.fr/software/104297/loopio) — 4.6/5 (74 reviews) 5. [HoneyBook](https://www.getapp.fr/software/108739/honeybook) — 4.7/5 (678 reviews) ## Avis ### "Speeds up knowledge gathering and response time" — 5.0/5 > **Joe** | *16 novembre 2023* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It's quite a luxury to be using Responsive when working with RFPs, customer/vendor questionnaires and similar documents that require gathering knowledge and answering inquiries. Most companies I know still use manual processes for the same and keep on having to redo the same work over and over again. Responsive provides an easy workflow, enterprise level access control and ability to build up a strong database of knowledge bits to semi-automate the necessary tasks and get answers to customers in a much faster way. > > **Inconvénients**: While I don't have direct experience with the ETL process that moves questions from customer systems/documents to Responsive, based on what I observe, the platform could be doing a better job of maintaining the question formats (e.g., multiple choice selections, drop-down fields, etc.) ----- ### "Beautiful UI, incredibly intuitive" — 5.0/5 > **Jennifer** | *14 mai 2019* | Services financiers | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The UI on RFPIO is so sleek and elegant, but more importantly, it's incredibly intuitive. Our goal for purchasing this product is to find something that will scale for us as we expand into different verticals, but also that will be easy for non-writer teammates to pick up. I have no doubt that RFPIO is the perfect choice to grow with us. > > **Inconvénients**: Nothing, really. Still figuring out the integration into our template, but that's just lack of time on my part, rather than a flaw in the software itself. > > The RFPIO team has been incredibly patient, friendly, and responsive. The level of user support is fantastic. ----- ### "Not that useful" — 1.0/5 > **Nelson** | *17 novembre 2023* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 1.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The progress tracking is nice and the ability to tag people for help on questions is useful. > > **Inconvénients**: The search is terrible. It constantly misidentifies what I'm searching for and shows completely unrelated results. Searching for answers is our main use case for this tool and it fails pretty miserably. I waste a lot of time in Responsive looking for things that should be straightforward. Its always a crapshoot importing documents, a lot of time it messes up identifying the right questions and answers and i've lost track of how many times the answers get exported to the wrong cell. > > Not good. Very frustrating using this product. I wish we used another tool. ----- ### "Very pleased Pre-Sales Team user of Responsive\!" — 5.0/5 > **Georgia** | *14 mars 2025* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The collaboration features, the Auto Respond feature, the mapping of projects and easy export into the source document. > > **Inconvénients**: Not a con as such, perhaps an inherent limitation of source files, but I would like some more accommodation of trickier source documents that e.g. have conditional questions (e.g. if Yes, reply to next question, if Not, do not) or documents that show or hide questions depending on how you previously answered to the questions above. Not sure if something could be enhanced in the tool to accommodate this, or other non-user-friendly types of RFx source files. > > 9/10, the only reason I'm not giving it 10 is because I'm not fully leveraging all the functionality as of yet (especially the Auto-Respond and GenAI capabilities to save me time and increase efficiency). ----- ### "Many options for content organization" — 4.0/5 > **Amber** | *7 janvier 2025* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: There are many options for organizing the Content Library, from tags, to collections, to multiple responses to a question, and more. The project management feature is also useful, especially the option to invite guests to collaborate and not require them to make an account. > > **Inconvénients**: There are many minor glitches, which after contacting the support team, usually get fixed in a timely manner, but after a while I don't want to report every little thing and wished that the QA team would catch them before going into production. Also the customer care team is hit and miss, and we faced some communication issues when it came to billing. > > I use this every day as part of my job and I am overall satisfied with the use of the tool and its many features. I am currently sorting out our thousands of pieces of content and I find the process enjoyable. ----- Page : 1/8\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.getapp.fr/software/103221/responsive?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur GetApp](https://www.getapp.fr/software/103221/responsive) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Données structurées